Transportation

Because being there is what's most important, WPC's Center for Transportation researches and analyzes the best practices for relieving traffic congestion by recapturing a vision of a system based on freedom of movement.

What's New

Transportation Funding

July 16, 2008 in Blog

I've written before how the state has needed to fill a $3.8 billion funding gap in the Nickel and TPA gas tax projects.  And here is a Seattle Times article on the same subject.

The legislature has found ways to fund the additional $3.8 billion during the last two sessions, but in the latest transportation revenue forecast released in June, lawmakers can continue to expect another large hole in funding the gas tax projects.

The June forecast shows that gas tax revenues are continuing to fall further from where WSDOT reported in its February forecast....about 2.1% more. And they expect gas tax revenues to tumble another 3.4% in the upcoming 2009-11 legislative biennium.

The legislature is running out of tricks to cover these shortfalls and this article from the Olympian shows that a showdown may take place on whether the legislature will use general fund revenue for transportation projects.

Skirting Accountability in Transportation

July 9, 2008 in Blog

I have heard Sound Transit and the WSDOT describe their projects as "on time and on budget" on several occasions, despite the clear evidence that shows they are late and over budget. Here is a bit of insight from The Olympian into why they continue to make that claim:

When the Department of Transportation says it has completed 108
projects on budget and 21 over budget, what does that mean? Because the
cost expectations change as the project changes, kinda like the due
dates for state mega computers move back routinely.

"I think everything eventually comes in on budget because we have to pay for it," quipped financial master Victor Moore.

At the GMAP meeting this morning, he referred to a chart of construction material costs, which looked like this: "Looking at the graph, it doesn't look like any of these projects have a chance in heck of coming in 'on budget,'" he said.

Transportation
Secretary Paula Hammond said that's been a debate in the department,
particularly since many of the projects in the Nickel and the
Transportation Partnership gas-tax packages were given funding and a
timeline before they got detailed planning.

"We use what we call
the 'last legislative expectation,'" she said. As in, each time the
Legislature tinkers with a project, the new budget line becomes "on
budget."

Using the "last legislative expectation" as a new base line is a tricky way to avoid accountability and thus eliminate any incentive to remain on time and on budget. Sound Move and the Nickel and TPA projects required significant tax increases that were sold on specific cost figures and promise dates. When the agencies fail to mainatin them, they cannot just change what was said for PR purposes.

Sound Transit and the WSDOT should instead use the "public's expectation" of what was originally promised.

 

 

New Report Shows Sound Transit Officials Give Public Money to Special Interest Groups

in Press releases

Seattle – Washington Policy Center released a new report showing Sound Transit officials using public money to contribute to special interest groups. The study was featured in an investigative report on KIRO 7 (CBS) television last night (video is available here).

Sound Transit Officials Give Public Money to Special Interest Groups

July 2, 2008 in Publications

In 1996, voters in Pierce, King and Snohomish counties authorized Sound Transit to pursue the first phase of a regional transit system known as Sound Move. In the process, Sound Transit received the authority to impose a sales tax, rental car tax and an excise tax on motor vehicles. In 2007, the agency collected about $353.4 million from taxpayers. Sound Transit’s mission is to “plan, build and operate regional transit systems and services to improve mobility for Central Puget Sound.”

Light Rail in Jerusalem, controversial there, too

June 26, 2008 in Blog

The new light rail line under construction in Jerusalem has a unique bridge at the entrance to Jerusalem. It is also known as the Bridge of Strings.
Untitled_3

2

Like with all light rail lines, the project has been controversial and charged with being over budget, late and making traffic congestion worse.

Heat over troubled bridge:

Nevertheless, the full picture is much less rosy than
the PR. While it is true that Jaffa Road will turn into a pedestrian
mall once the trams start running, the price that other streets in the
area will pay will more than make up for any good on Jaffa Road.

The traffic that will be banned from Jaffa Road to make room for
the trains - according to the agreement signed with the operator - will
flow instead onto the roads surrounding the center, and it will turn
these urban streets into main roads, and drive out the soul of
downtown.

Worst off will be Prophets Street, a wonderful, historic little
neighborhood with unique architecture that may be turned into a
polluted and congested traffic artery.

In Jerusalem, even a bridge divides:

Yet the bridge, with its 387-foot tilted mast and 66 cables, has not
been uniformly welcomed in the city, where architectural change often
confronts the weight of history and forces of habit that run deep.

"This is out of proportion, grandiose and has gone too far," said Yoni
Tzabari, 30, as he gazed at the steel and cable complex outside his
window. "We're not in New York."

2008 Annual Transportation Event

June 24, 2008 in Events
Date: 
Tuesday, June 24th, 2008
Time: 
7:30 am - 9:00 am
Place: 
The Harbor Club
Seattle, WA

On June 17th, Washington Policy Center held its Annual Center for Transportation Event. This year’s event featured a breakfast keynote address by transportation and economics expert and Senior Research Fellow with the Heritage Foundation, Ronald D. Utt, Ph.D. He addressed congestion relief and discussed ways Washington State could improve.

More on Performance based transportation policy

June 19, 2008 in Blog

Here is Dr. Utt with Kirby Wilbur.
Here is Dr. Utt with The Commentators, Ken Schram and John Carlson. 

The breakfast was also recorded by TVW.
Its worth listening about how other states prioritize congestion relief. Interestingly, instead of spending transportation taxes based on political favors, other states base their decisions on performance.

Performance Based Transportation Policy

June 18, 2008 in Blog

On Tuesday, we held our second annual transportation event featuring Dr. Ronald Utt, a Senior Fellow at the Heritage Foundation.

Dr. Utt talked about the value of a performance based transportation policy and presented his findings from a policy paper he co-authored called, Rush Hour: How States Can Reduce Congestion Through Performance-Based Transportation Programs.

Among the
several performance plans imple­mented to date, the most direct is that
of Texas, where the state DOT is mandated to reduce conges­tion in the
state's metropolitan areas by 50 percent in 25 years...By holding public
officials responsible for achieving quantitative goals within a
specified time span, state DOTs have a powerful incentive to spend
their limited resources efficiently on projects that have the maximum
im­pact in reducing congestion and improving mobility.

He also mentioned how Washington's congestion audit on the WSDOT is influencing policymakers in Virgina to implement a similar performance audit there. The Virgina State Legislature is set to meet in a special session next week to counter a proposed tax increase with a Washington-style audit on the VDOT. Here is a statement from Delegate Sam Nixon:

“As the General Assembly convenes its special session next
week to discuss transportation, one of the most important pieces of legislation
that will be proposed is a thorough, independent audit on the efficiency and
effectiveness of the Virginia Department of Transportation. I, along with the House Republican leadership
and many members of our Caucus strongly support having a private sector entity conduct
this performance audit of VDOT in order to identify opportunities for cost
savings, private sector involvement and unnecessary or unproductive programs
that could be reduced or eliminated. While Governor Kaine continues to use questionable justification for his
massive statewide tax plan, House Republicans want to make sure that government
is functioning properly before even considering asking for more money from
hard-working Virginians during this time of economic uncertainty. Our Caucus is firmly behind this initiative
and hope that it receives a clear bipartisan endorsement next week.”

And here is an editorial from the state's Attorney General, Bob McDonnell. He says the first step in solving Virginia's transportation troubles is not to raise taxes but to perform "an audit of annual transportation spending, as was just done in Washington state with dramatic results."

Its nice to know that we are doing something right. Now if we can just get the legislature to adopt the SAO's recommendations and prioritize congestion relief. 

Special Evening Reception for Our Whatcom County Area Supporters

June 3, 2008 in Events
Date: 
Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008
Time: 
5:30 pm - 7:00 pm
Place: 
Bellingham, WA

This special reception and wrap-up of the 2008 Legislative Session was for our supporters and those interested in learning more about our work.  The recently completed Session was discussed, with a focus on how it will affect you and your business.  WPC’s president and research center directors gave reviews of their work during Session, including publications on the state budget, taxes, health care, transportation, the environment and ways to improve the business climate.  They also presented the top issues to look for during the remainder of this busy election year and previ

Free-Market Land Use Policy, by way of Houston, TX

May 17, 2008 in Blog

I'm attending the American Dream Conference in Houston, Texas this weekend and I've learned some interesting things.

Houston is the fourth largest city in the United States.
Though, its median sales price of existing homes in 2007 was only $152 thousand.
Compare this to the top six largest cities:

City                     Population                  2007
median sales price, existing homes

       New York, New York (pop 8,213,839)  $380-$540 thousand

2)    Los Angeles, California (pop 3,847,059)   $589
thousand

3)    Chicago, Illinois (pop 2,842,753)   $276
thousand

4)    Houston, Texas (pop 2,117,937)  $152 thousand

5)    Phoenix, Arizona (pop 1,469,794)  $257 thousand

6)    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (pop 1,456,350)  $234 thousand

 

One
reason is that Houston is the largest city in the country that does not
regulate land-use through zoning. This means the free-market dictates where
commercial and residential activities occur.

There
are areas of the city where a large high rise shares a city block with a single
family home. While this may sound
unthinkable, consider that it does not happen in all places and where it does,
prices adjust to the situation. So a home near a commercial property would cost
less than a similar home in a traditional neighborhood.

Houston
is not without regulation, however. Typically, the use of a property is defined
through deed restrictions. So each property contains individual restrictions
that limit what the owner can do with the property. These restrictions are
similar to HOA agreements and they can range from landscaping to building
height requirements. The deed restrictions can expire (usually within about 50
years) and can be renewed (or left to expire).

Some
property owners will allow their deed restrictions to expire in order to sell
the property for commercial purposes with no land use limitations. This is how
large multi-use activities become intermixed. They are usually highly controversial and opposed by the local
residents.

Deed
restrictions can also influence the value of a property. Most residents enjoy
predictability with land use so tight restrictions that last a long time are
more desirable. Likewise, unrestricted properties are an invitation for
commercial enterprises.

While mixing residential and commercial development might be undesirable to some people, the majority of Houston residents seem to prefer it. There
have been several attempts to move Houston toward zoning but the public has consistently
rejected the idea. Thus, preserving the free-market system.