Seattle teachers' union seeks ban on teachers—sees Teach for America as a threat to its position in the system
Last night I went to a meeting at Seattle School District headquarters in the John Stanford Center on Lander Street South, because the Seattle School Board is moving to bar Teach for America teachers from Seattle schools. Teach for America is the teacher training program that provides talented teachers to schools across the nation, especially helping poor and minority students. At the meeting were Superintendent Susan Enfield and the seven school board members, including two new members elected in November, Sharon Peaslee and Marty McLaren. Also attending were teachers union members, the executive director of Teach for America, and several Teach for America teachers and coaches.
The first move of the teachers union since the November election is to ban Teach for America teachers from Seattle. The school board voted 6-1 in October 2010 to give Teach for America a three-year contract. Even though six Teach for America teachers in Seattle have taught in South Seattle Schools for nearly a year, the teachers union wants to cancel their contract. The union sees Teach for America as a threat to their power and influence in the system.
The only two speakers without a personal interest in the outcome were Lisa MacFarlane and myself, two middle-aged moms. Lisa spoke eloquently about the need to honor previous commitments.
My testimony is available online (at 29:58):
My conclusions are based on my research of the effectiveness of Teach for America teachers in other states.
The union's effort to ban these teachers helps explain why Washington has been called an education reform backwater.
Testimony before the Seattle School Board, March 7, 2012:
Seattle School Board should not ban Teach for America teachers from Seattle classrooms
The Seattle School Board is considering a motion to ban Teach for America teachers from Seattle Schools. Proponents offer three reasons for wanting to ban Teach for America teachers from Seattle.
Reason #1: TFA teachers are not needed as there is no shortage of fully certificated teachers, experienced and novice, in the Seattle area.
This is incorrect. Teach for America teachers are talented individuals. Turning away TFA recruits artificially shrinks the talent pool available to Seattle’s schools, and denies Seattle Public School students access to the best teachers. Teach for America recruits attend the most highly selective colleges, including Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Princeton and the University of Washington.
Students at the University of Washington, many of whom attended Seattle Public Schools, are now seeking to become Teach for America recruits. Last year, out of a graduating class of 50,000 students, 7% of all seniors at the University of Washington, the most selective public university in Washington, applied to Teach for America. This year University of Washington ranked #4 nationwide in Teach for America applications. The University of Washington ranked #1 nationwide in Teach for America recruits who majored in Science Technology Engineering or Math. Over 40% of all applicants are people of color. Over one-third all applicants received federal Pell grants, an indicator of low socioeconomic status.
Banning Teach for America means many University of Washington graduates will be banned from teaching in Seattle schools.
In sum, Teach for America teachers are needed in Seattle, as they are highly qualified, come from diverse backgrounds, and offer Seattle needed expertise in STEM subjects.
Reason #2: There has been no substantive evidence presented to support Teach for America recruitment as a viable method to reduce the achievement gap .
This is not accurate. Teach for America is one of the most extensively studied teacher-preparation programs in the nation, and many rigorous studies show Teach for America teachers are highly successful with poor and minority students:
- “The Effects of Teach for America on Students” (Mathematica Policy Research, 2004). Using random assignment of students to teachers, the gold standard for research methodology, this national study found that students of Teach for America teachers made more progress in a year in both reading and math than would typically be expected, and attained significantly greater gains in math compared with students of other teachers, including veteran and certified teachers. This study also found that Teach for America teachers were working in the highest-need classrooms in the country, with students beginning the year on average at the 14% percentile against the national norm.
- New Orleans: Paul Pastorek, former superintendent of Louisiana schools was in Seattle last month and said that the Recovery School District in New Orleans uses the highest proportion of Teach for America teachers in the nation. This district has doubled the achievement of mostly poor and minority students in the last five years.
- Tennessee: “Teacher State Report Card on Teacher Effectiveness” (Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program, 2011). The study found that Teach for America is the top teacher preparation program in the state of Tennessee: the average Teach for America teacher had greater impact on student achievement than the average new 4th - 8th grade teacher in Tennessee.
- North Carolina: “Impacts of Teacher Preparation on Student Test Scores in North Carolina: Teacher Portals” (Gary Henry and Charles Thompson 2010). Teach for America teachers did as well as or better than traditionally prepared UNC graduates.
- Louisiana: “Louisiana Value-Added Teacher Preparation Assessment Study (Louisiana Practitioner Teacher Project, 2009) Teach for America teacher perform like veteran certified teachers, better than new traditionally trained teachers.
- North Carolina: “Making a Difference? The Effects of Teach for America in High School” (The Urban Institute/CALDER Research Center, 2009). Teach for America are more effective teaching math than traditionally certificated teachers.
Since 1990, nearly 33,000 Teach for America teachers have taught more than 3 million students. Today, Teach for America teachers work in 43 regions in 32 states and Washington D.C. In the 2011-12 school year, more than 9,000 corps members are teaching 600,000 students across the nation. Sixty-seven percent of TFA’s alumni pursue education as a career. Many Teach for America teachers have become education leaders, founding dozens of high-performing schools, boldly leading school districts and charter management organizations and helping pass groundbreaking education legislation.
In sum, there is substantial evidence that Teach for America teachers are successful at closing the achievement gap.
Reason #3: The contract is opposed by the Seattle Education Association, the teachers union
This claim is true. But Teach for America has brought new prestige and success to the profession of teaching, and is attracting our most talented youth back into teaching. Teach for America teachers make some adults in the system uncomfortable. Teach for America teachers represent a challenge to the status quo. Teach for America teachers bring new ideas and new approaches to tackling the problems facing our schools. This new talent and energy should be encouraged, not driven away, from Seattle.
What we do best in this country is giving people opportunities. This is what Teach for America does: it offers young people the opportunity to teach children. Teach for America has proven to be an entry point for thousands of young people whose experience in classrooms has convinced them to become teachers, to become principals, to become leaders of school districts and innovators in education on every level. Teach for America is a great organization and we should welcome it here.
Comments
Propaganda
"Reason #1: TFA teachers are not needed as there is no shortage of fully certificated teachers, experienced and novice, in the Seattle area.
This is incorrect. Teach for America teachers are talented individuals. Turning away TFA recruits artificially shrinks the talent pool available to Seattle’s schools"
This is a ridiculous statement. There IS no shortage of teachers in Seattle. BY adding uncertified teachers, TFA is the one artificially inflating the "talent pool." It's like you wrote, "By keeping uncertified teachers out of the hiring pool, turning away TFA artificially shrinks the talent pool."
I saw what you wrote recently, Ms. Finne. It's posted on Save Seattle Schools blog. Have you no shame? Have you no respect for Seattle's teachers and students and parents and board members? Must you insult them all with you silly lies about how it's all the union's fault and how the union bought the two (even those their opponest outspent them three to one using "reform" money) and somehow actual certified teachers are less qualified than TFA...
Have you no decency, ma'am? Please. Give it a rest. You're embarassing yourself.
TFA Misrepresentations
The research on TFA is fundamentally flawed. It does not separate out those that wash out of the program. For example, at my school in California, we had six new TFA "teachers" but only two lasted even a year. So four had no "test scores" or achievement data. The only data came from the exceptional ones who managed to hold on. Second, even the in TFA research that show some possible "statistically" significant" improvement in math -- the improvement is very, very tiny.
TFA recruits do not stay in the classroom. Well over half leave at or before their two year commitment. There is no continuity.
If you look at countries (like Finland, Japan, Singapore) that excel in international tests in math and science, they have very high professional teaching expectations that include a teacher preparation program. TFA insults teachers, children and schools by saying that if you graduate from Harvard, you must be a great teacher. It is just ridiculous.
Please keep TFA!!
I truly hope that Seattle Education Association will see the long-term value of TFA!
As an aspiring teacher, currently working toward my BA, I will need to also attend a minimum one-year teacher certification program after my BA. At that point, I would love to be a part of TFA!
College is prohibitively expensive, especially for individuals like myself who were raised in poverty! The TFA program would provide me with another 2 years interest-free to pay off more of my accumulating student loan debt. Without a program like TFA, there is no way that I would have considered taking out student loans! Without student loans, I would not be able to afford to attend college at all and would be instead merely working at my THREE PART-TIME JOBS.
PLEASE PLEASE KEEP TFA!!
Not that I support many
Not that I support many teacher's union positions, but I actually do support this one. As an unemployed teacher I may be unfairly biased, but the person who wrote this article makes several false assumption, IMO. My WA State Teaching Certificate was more than 70 credits and took 1.5 years at full-time student status. I worked my ass off and I am a better teacher because of my coursework. TFA "trains" recent graduates in 4 weeks. TFA wants to have a contract with school districts to place their teachers which is a benefit that other applicants, like me, do not enjoy. If the TFA teachers are "all that," let them go toe-to-toe with other credentialed teachers and hopefully, the cream will rise to the top.
Charli - I agree with you
Charli - I agree with you that districts should hire the best candidate regardless of whether the teacher is through TFA or not.
However, I disagree that SEA should scrap the TFA program.
As a college student working toward my BA and then planning to get my teaching certificate after that, I'm counting on TFA in order to be able to afford college in the long-run.
I'm taking out loans currently as that is the only way for me to afford college. Joining the TFA program would allow me a way to have more time (2 extra years) to pay those loans back before beginning to accrue interest. As a single parent, working 3 part-time jobs while in college, I would have to give up college, without the hope of this program to assist me after the fact, since I don't qualify for programs to assist me in initially paying for college.
this is just ridiculous...
I am a senior in an applied math major at a public research university, and have taken far more (and more intense) pure and applied math courses, and science courses, than the typical math teacher. I have a stronger understanding of the fundamentals than the typical math teacher as a result. I understand the root of most math-related phobias more fully than the typical math teacher. I understand the relevance of mathematics in the work place and in society, which is something that was never properly explained to me when I was in high school. At this point I would consider 'education' courses to be a breath of fresh air, but I have instead spent my time in college building a stronger foundation in the mathematical sciences.
I also do not go to school in Washington, so even if I was on a teacher certification path (and watering down my mathematical foundation in the process) I still would not be eligible to teach in your school system. Do you really think that I am not worthy of even a chance to teach in your school system, even if a program like TFA had faith that I am capable of teaching successfully? Considering the significance of your school system's shortcomings (especially in math education), don't you think you should be more open-minded to new approaches? Perhaps the union should be more concerned with the needs of their students and less concerned with themselves.
Undergraduate years should be devoted to learning the subjects as fully as possible. If we wish to teach then we should be able to learn the art of teaching afterward, through a reputable program like TFA, so that we do not miss out on building a truly proper foundation in the field that we now wish to teach. This, in my opinion, is the best way to build highly proficient teachers. This is ESPECIALLY TRUE for producing high school math and science teachers.