Jason Mercier of the Washington Policy Center compares Gov. Jay Inslee’s actions to others
Jason Mercier
Washington Policy Center
Governor Inslee has repeatedly made it clear that he believes his spending priorities exceed any need to provide tax relief to help families deal with the impact of record inflation. On the same day Inslee declined President Biden’s call for states to provide some type of tax relief, the Democratic Governor of Minnesota was instead begging his legislature to act. As reported by the Minnesota Reformer:
“Gov. Tim Walz called on Republicans to return to the Capitol to sign off on sending $1,000 checks to Minnesotans as the rising price of gas, food and everything else eats away at people’s paychecks.
‘It is absolutely unconscionable not to do this,’ Walz said during a Wednesday news conference.
The state is sitting on about a $7 billion budget surplus. Under Walz’s proposal, the state would rebate about $4 billion of the budget surplus to taxpayers . . .
Walz said he was recently on a call with Ben Bernanke, chair of the Federal Reserve under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, who told a group of governors that they should return surplus dollars to taxpayers if they have them.”
Meanwhile in Washington, the Everett Herald reported this contrast:
“President Joe Biden on Wednesday urged Congress to suspend collection of federal taxes on gas and diesel for three months.
And he called on state leaders to do the same, or something similar, to further help drivers cope with soaring pump prices . . .
Not going to happen in Washington, where the tax on gas and diesel is 49 cents a gallon.
Gov. Jay Inslee is steadfastly opposed.
‘Pausing the gas tax provides yet another opportunity for oil companies to pocket more profit while significantly hindering our ability to put people to work fixing and building roads and bridges,’ said Jaime Smith, Inslee’s executive director of communications . . .
The president called on states to enact some form of temporary, across-the-board tax relief as a new revenue forecast was released by Washington’s chief economist predicting tax collections by the state will be $1.46 billion higher than the February forecast.”
Although Governor Inslee says he doesn’t support President Biden’s call for gas tax relief because he believes it would just benefit oil companies, there are other options to help Washingtonians deal with record inflation such as reducing the state’s sales or property tax. Yesterday’s $1.5 billion increase in the state revenue forecast provides yet another opportunity for Washington officials to do just this and finally prioritize tax relief.
As noted by Minnesota’s Democratic Governor, it is “absolutely unconscionable” not to provide tax relief to help families deal with crushing inflation, especially when government officials are sitting on even more taxpayer money than was expected when adopting the budget.
Jason Mercier is the director of the Center for Government Reform at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Opinion: State is gathering stories about long-term careElizabeth New (Hovde) of the Washington Policy Center believes lawmakers should focus on strengthening the Medicaid safety net by passing reforms that end abuse of a program meant for the vulnerable.
- Letter: Strong public schools build strong communities!Ridgefield resident Michele Wollert offers her support for the Ridgefield School District bond proposals in the April 23 special election.
- Opinion: There are plenty of ways to reduce the cost of the I-5 Bridge replacement projectClark County Today Editor Ken Vance shares ways the proposed I-5 Bridge replacement project price tag can be trimmed.
- Opinion: Ridgefield School District decisions impact capacity and overcrowdingRidgefield School District has partially created its own capacity and overcrowding issues, according to Ridgefield resident Heidi Pozzo in the latest of her assessments of the district’s school bond proposal for the April 23 special election.
- Opinion: Upper Columbia River – The Human Health AssessmentNancy Churchill offers the fourth of a series of articles about the proposed EPA Superfund site on the upper Columbia River.