Today, The Seattle Times reports members of the state Charter School Commission may consider a rule to prohibit family members from serving together on the board of directors of a charter school. The charter school law allows family members on charter school boards, but the Commission is moving to block family members from working together to help their local school.
The News Tribune reports members of the Tacoma school board say too many area families may try to send their children to local charter schools, so they want Olympia to make it illegal for educators to open more than two such schools in any district.
Over the holidays, respected former state senator Jim Kastama (D-Puyallup), who served from 1996 to 2012, wrote in The Seattle Times about being misled when he voted for ESHB 2261, the hugely complex bill that redefined “basic education” and called for massive increases in funding, but included no significant reforms in the way education services are delivered.
This two-and-a-half minute report from KOMO News radio gives a good overview of what’s happening at First Place Scholars Charter School in Seattle. It also includes my comments about the advantage charter schools have in turning things around quickly to improve learning from students, improvements that are difficult, or never attempted, at many failing traditional public schools.
A front-page story in The Seattle Times by Leah Todd reports on troubles at First Place Scholars Charter School, the headline saying the school is in “disarray” over recent leadership changes. Yet the details of the story show that Washington’s best-in-the-nation charter school law is working as intended.
As lawmakers prepare for the upcoming legislative session in Olympia, there is a lot of debate about where our state ranks in education spending. As an analyst, I know this all depends on what metric a lawmaker uses, and the metric chosen often depends on whether the lawmaker wants to increase taxes. A poor ranking makes it appear that more spending and a heavier tax burden are urgently needed.
It has been widely reported that Democrats lost the recent mid-term election, but less noticed is that voters also delivered a series of defeats to executives at the Washington Education Association (WEA) union.
New research finds that some justices on the state supreme court have received political contributions from a lead party in a key lawsuit now before the court.
Parties in the case, League of Women Voters, Washington Education Association, et al vs State of Washington, are asking the court to strike down Washington’s charter school law, passed by voters in 2012, and bar children from attending a charter public school.
Nine weeks after classes started, students at Garfield High School in Seattle learned last week that they will be losing one of their teachers.
Administrators at the state’s largest school district, overseen by Board President Sharon Peaslee and six other board members, informed Garfield and five other local schools they planned to take away one of their teachers.
It’s widely assumed that Initiative 1351, the ballot measure that purports to reduce class sizes, will pass by a wide margin. The initiative title has bumper-sticker attractiveness, it faces no organized opposition, and executives at the powerful WEA and other unions are putting $3.5 million of their members’ dues money behind it. (In Washington, teachers must pay the union as a condition of employment.)
Backers of Initiative 1351 are asking voters to support reduced class sizes without providing a way to pay for it. Smaller class sizes without higher taxes – who wouldn’t be for that? As one skeptic quipped, it’s like asking people to vote for puppies and apple pie.
Initiative 1351, the ballot measure on class sizes, will bring new profits to the powerful WEA union because all new teachers will be forced to pay about $1,000 a year in dues as a condition of employment. Overall the measure represents a $7.4 million windfall for the union, every year.
At the same time, I-1351 would do little to improve learning for Washington’s school children.
A statement released Saturday by the Washington state Democratic Party falsely describes the political support behind Initiative 1351, the unfunded ballot measure intended to reduce class sizes.
The statement says “As Democrats, we are united” in supporting strong schools and educational opportunities then adds in bold lettering, “That’s why Democrats support Initiative 1351 to reduce class size for every child, in every grade.”
Last weekin Yakima, in the second round of charter school applications, the Washington State Charter School Commission approved only one new school and rejected three others. Here are the actions Commissioners took:
Washington’s charter school law, one of the best in the country, is working as the voters intended when they passed Initiative 1240 in 2012. The state Charter School Commission has approved seven new schools to open their doors to students this year and next, and officials at the Spokane School District have approved a charter school to serve the city’s low-income families. The state’s first charter school, First Place Scholars, opened in September in Seattle’s Central District, helping homeless and low-income children gain access to a good public education.