Jmercier

Is Governor a tax raiser or tax cutter?

September 16, 2008 in Blog

Last week we highlighted an Olympian blog post that quotes Governor Gregoire on whether or not she's raised taxes. Among the statements made by the Governor:

"Did I raise your sales tax? No. Did I raise property taxes? No. In fact, I brought the Legislature in to cap the property tax with a special session last fall. Did I raise B&O tax? No. What’s the truth? The truth is we cut those taxes almost by $900 million since I came into office."

I asked the Office of Financial Management (OFM) for additional details on these tax cuts. OFM provided the following table in response (Dollars in Millions):

Tax Cuts

2005-07B

2007-09B

Total

General Fund - State

(77.9)

(288.0)

(365.9)

Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund

(31.8)

(141.5)

(173.3)

Workers Compensation Trust Funds

(22.2)

(309.5)

(331.7)

Other Funds

0.0

(9.7)

(9.7)

Total Tax Cuts

(131.9)

(748.7)

(880.6)

WPC's Small Business Director Carl Gipson takes a closer look at the Workers' Compensation numbers in his blog post today.

In light of the $400 million in tax INCREASES during the 2005 Session, I'm following up with OFM to learn if its table accounts for these increases and for additional details on the General Fund tax cuts reported. I'll update this post once I have the answer.

What qualifies as a tax increase?

September 11, 2008 in Blog

The Olympian today has an interesting blog post quoting Governor Gregoire about whether or not she's raised taxes (excluding gas-taxes). Here is what the Governor said (in-part):

"Did I raise your sales tax? No. Did I raise property taxes? No. In fact, I brought the Legislature in to cap the property tax with a special session last fall. Did I raise B&O tax? No. What’s the truth? The truth is we cut those taxes almost by $900 million since I came into office. So the money that we used to do what we’ve done has been because our economy has been humming. And that’s why I’ve tried always to get new employers in here and to make sure we have the skilled work force, because when the economy hums, we can pay for education, we can pay for health care, we can pay for community safety. When the economy slumps, then we can’t." "So he [Rossi] then!
says, ‘she is going to raise taxes,’ Well I didn’t raise taxes to get out of the $2.2 billion deficit he gave me. On what basis does he say that? … (H)e wants you to be afraid. He wants you to be afraid. I just think this ought to be a straight-up election."

Based on this quote one is left to wonder just what the Governor believes qualifies as a tax increase. For example, in 2005, the Governor signed into law approximately $400 million in tax increases made possible by suspending the 2/3 vote requirement from I-601. The largest of these tax increases were:

  • Cigarettes – $175 million
  • Death-tax – $139 million
  • Liquor – $47 million
  • Extended warranties for product repairs or replacements –  $37 million

These tax increases were the subject of a court challenge for violating I-601 but were ultimately upheld by the State Supreme Court last year (this is a separate lawsuit than the one heard by the Court this week).

If these aren't tax increases, what exactly are they and why did the Governor and Legislature feel the need to suspend the 2/3 vote requirement in 2005 to adopt them?

If I was a betting man . . .

September 9, 2008 in Blog

. . . I'd put money on the State Supreme Court dismissing Senator Lisa Brown's tax lawsuit on procedural grounds. At today's Court hearing on the constitutionality of I-601, the Justices spent most of their time questioning whether the way Brown filed her lawsuit is something they can rule on. In particular, Justice Barbara Madsen expressed concern with the Senator's attempt to have the Court inject itself in the legislative process of passing a bill.

If the Court does ultimately pass on deciding the constitutionality of a 2/3 vote requirement for tax increases, the clearest way to resolve this issue once and for all is for the Legislature to put on the ballot a constitutional amendment and allow the voters to decide.

UW spending $175 per hour to lobby for new stadium

September 4, 2008 in Blog

While reviewing state personal service contracts back in July, a $50,000 lobbying contract for the University of Washington (UW) caught my attention. Unfortunately, the information listed on the Office of Financial Management's website didn't disclose what the lobbying was for so I asked the UW for a copy of the contract. Nearly two months from my first request, I finally received a copy of the contract today.

Turns out the $50,000 contract is for a consultant "to provide legislative drafting and fiscal analysis related to the 2008 request for state financial assistance to remodel Husky stadium." The contract was originally to expire March 31, 2008, but its terms have been extended until June 30, 2009.

The contract further notes the "consultant will be paid $175 per hour for his services, and receive reimbursement for associated reasonable expenses, including travel costs."

Here is a copy of the contract.

In a strange coincidence, the Spokesman Review this week highlighted the bad blood east of the Cascades for efforts to use taxpayer dollars to remodel Husky stadium.

Although Husky stadium may need renovations, rather than paying a lobbyist $175 per hour to secure taxpayer funding, why not use some of the UW's $2.7 billion endowment or asking for alumni help?

Gregoire/Rossi on tax increases

September 3, 2008 in Blog

On September 9, 2008, the State Supreme Court will consider Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown's lawsuit seeking to have the 2/3 vote requirement for tax increases ruled unconstitutional to make it easier for state officials to raise taxes.

Last week I asked spokespeople for both Governor Gregoire and Senator Rossi if they support a 2/3 vote requirement for tax increases and if yes, would they support placing them in the Constitution like was done with the rainy day reserve from I-601.

Here are the official responses:

Gregoire* - “I think it’s a moot issue because I think it [tax increases] ought to go to a vote of the people.”

Rossi spokesperson - "Dino believes in upholding the will of the people and does support I-601’s 2/3 vote requirement. He would be supportive of a constitutional amendment to require a 2/3 vote for tax increases."

Based on these responses, it appears that both Governor Gregoire and Senator Rossi support WPC's recommendation to amend the Constitution to require either a 2/3 vote of the legislature or voter approval for tax increases.


*These comments were made on 8/27 during a KIRO 710 radio interview. On 8/29 a spokesperson for Gregoire said to refer to this interview in response to my question for an official position.

Contrast in pay raises

September 2, 2008 in Blog

While Bellevue teachers engage in an illegal strike over pay raises, Governor Gregoire last week sent a memo to agency directors informing them of her plans to cancel their pay raises. According to the Governor's memo:

"After much thought and in light of our nation's economic struggles, I have decided the cost of living raise, which you were scheduled to receive on September 1, 2008, is not appropriate at this time. My decision affects all agency directors under my control in addition to the Senior Staff of the Governor's Office . . . I take this step because I believe you and I should make a clear statement to the people of Washington: we understand that many families are not rece!
iving pay raises while coping with high food and fuel prices, and other financial challenges."

So what "statement" are Bellevue teachers sending taxpayers and students by breaking the law?

Gregoire on 2/3 vote requirement for tax increases

August 27, 2008 in Blog

Earlier this week I asked spokespeople for both Governor Gregoire and Senator Rossi if they support a 2/3 vote requirement for tax increases and if yes, would they support placing them in the constitution like was done with the rainy day reserve from I-601.

Though I haven't received an official response yet from the candidates, Governor Gregoire was on the Dori Monson show today (KIRO 710) and was asked the same question.

Here was the tail end of their exchange on this issue:

Dori: "Yes or no, do you support the 2/3 legislative majority for tax increases?"

Gregoire: “I think it’s a moot issue because I think it [tax increases] ought to go to a vote of the people.” 

The full interview is worth listening to. Discussion about the budget deficit starts at 12:50 of the interview (audio here). The exchange on the 2/3 requirement for tax increases starts at 21:22 on the audio link.

I'll post the official responses from Governor Gregoire and Senator Rossi once I receive them. 

Debt performance audit receives kudos

August 27, 2008 in Blog

The State Auditor's recent performance audit of state debt collection practices received numerous kudos today at a public hearing. Along with receiving congratulations from legislative members of the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee, the Director of the Office of Financial Management also thanked the auditors for their work.

The audit found:

". . . eight programs that need to improve their collection practices. If the eight programs reduce their delinquent account balances by a modest 5 percent, the state will collect approximately $15.6 million more per year. If they reduce delinquent account balances by 50 percent, they can collect an additional $159.7 million."

Rep. Gary Alexander and Sen. Phil Rockefeller encouraged the State Auditor's Office to expand this effort to review the practices of the state's higher education schools. The auditors agreed to look in that direction.

The Department of Revenue (DOR) received special recognition for not have any findings in the audit. It looks like DOR is really on the ball. Last year it received its 15th straight clean state audit.

Governor not familiar with tax lawsuit

August 25, 2008 in Blog

Apparently the Senate Majority Leader's lawsuit to make it easier to raise taxes has been flying below the Governor's radar. The Spokesman Review asked the Governor about the case yesterday. According to the article:

"Gov. Chris Gregoire, locked in a close race for re-election, has repeatedly declined to say if she supports Brown's case. She says she's not familiar with the specifics.

'I know that everybody thinks that's surprising. I have not studied it,' Gregoire said in a recent interview."

With the State Supreme Court set to hear arguments about the case on September 9, there is still time for the Governor to study this issue and form an opinion.

This morning I asked spokespeople for both Governor Gregoire and Senator Rossi if they support a 2/3 vote requirement for tax increases and if yes, would they support placing them in the constitution like was done with the rainy day reserve from I-601. I'll post any responses I receive.

Perhaps this is a question that should also be asked at one of the upcoming gubernatorial debates.

State employee pay raises agreed to?

August 22, 2008 in Blog

The Olympian is reporting that the first of the state employment contracts being negotiated has been agreed to. According to the article:

The Washington Public Employees Association has reached an agreement with Gov. Chris Gregoire's bargaining team for a 1.6 percent general pay raise in 2009, followed by 1.7 percent in 2010. Union members must approve the deal.

The union closed bargaining on the contract primary election night, Aug. 19, said Diane Leigh, Gregoire's lead negotiator.

It's news to me. I didn't hear from the WPEA about it (no news on their Website, either), and hadn’t been able to connect with Leigh until today. The largest general government union, the Washington Federation of State Employees, is still at the bargaining table, but if past experience is any indication, all pay raises will follow a very similar scale.

I called the Senate Ways and Means Committee to see what impact, if any, this news has on its projection of a $2.7 billion budget deficit.

Although the committee didn’t breakdown its projection based on a particular COLA assumption (instead used functional areas – page 3), I was told today's news shouldn’t make a big change one way or another on the budget outlook. 

DOR supports searchable tax transparency website reform

August 20, 2008 in Blog

The Department of Revenue (DOR) has responded favorably to our proposal for creation of an online searchable database of all tax rates in the state. According to a spokesperson for DOR (in-part):

"The Department of Revenue considers the web to be a great way to communicate with taxpayers and the public, and it supports the concept of a searchable database of state and local taxes by location. In fact, it already has been moving toward that goal as resources permit."

Along with DOR, we've already heard from other state policymakers interested in moving forward with this reform. Hopefully understanding your state and local tax burden will soon be a click away.

Additional Information
DOR's full response to our proposal
Seattle PI editorial in support
Washington Policy Center Proposes Tax Transparency Website
Taxation Disclosure Act

Seattle PI endorses WPC Tax Transparency proposal

August 18, 2008 in Blog

The Seattle PI this morning offers an endorsement of our proposal for creation of a tax transparency website. From the article (in-part):

"The Legislature and the governor recently moved the state into a new era of budget transparency with a law creating a searchable Web site detailing state spending. The state should advance its impressive digital empowerment of the public by giving everyone access to the same type of information about his or her state and local taxes.

The Washington Policy Center last week unveiled a proposal to create 'a tax transparency Web site' allowing individuals and businesses to figure out just how much they are paying in all local and state taxes . . .

The center's Jason Mercier, who wrote the new proposal and helped inspire the spending Web site, called complete, searchable online taxing a 'natural next step' for the state in its efforts to be more transparent about financial issues. Like the spending idea, this plan ought to have bipartisan appeal. Whether one tends to think we have too few services or too many taxes, there is broad common ground on the value of accurate information for making good decisions . . .

Lawmakers and the governor should move quickly next year to take another big step forward in our high-tech state's use of technology to improve public understanding of the public's business."

1,783 taxing districts in Washington

August 15, 2008 in Blog

Many thanks to the Department of Revenue for sending over a table categorizing the state's 1,783 taxing districts. Want to know which ones you owe taxes to and how much that means to your total tax burden?

Yesterday we proposed the creation of an online searchable database of all tax rates for each taxing district to help citizens and business-owners answer this question.

Details here.

How much do you pay in taxes?

August 14, 2008 in Blog

Have you ever wondered what your total state and local tax bill is but struggled to calculate government’s take of your income?

So have we.

This is why we think it is time for creation of an online searchable database of all tax rates for each taxing district to help citizens and business-owners answer this question. To help facilitate this reform we've drafted model language for what we call the "Taxation Disclosure Act."

The language is modeled after this year's successful adoption of Washington Policy Center’s recommendation for the state to adopt a searchable budget website.

We are hopeful that policy makers will see this proposal as an opportunity to make taxation more transparent and help citizens learn more about what government decisions mean to their pocket books.

Click here to view WPC's "Taxation Disclosure Act."

OFM launches government performance website

August 13, 2008 in Blog

The Office of Financial Management (OFM) launched its "State Government Performance and Results" website today. We've been working with OFM and the Evergreen Freedom Foundation the past few years to bring this resource to the public.

The new tool provides citizens with a one stop resource for information on an agency's:

  • Strategic plan;
  • Inventory of activities;
  • Performance progress reports;
  • Performance assessments;
  • Expenditures to date; and
  • Links to other resources such as performance audit reports.

Here is an example of the information available for the Department of Transportation. By viewing the expenditure report for DOT we learn that the agency is currently $10.4 million over budget.

When coupled with the new searchable budget website set to go live later this year, taxpayers will have the ability to keep a closer eye on the performance of government.

When you have time, Jeffrey [dot] Showman [at] OFM [dot] WA [dot] GOV (give a shout out to OFM) for its work on bringing this resource to the public.